ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity in elderly patient with osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 elderly patients (mean age, 72.6 years) underwent scarf osteotomy for HV deformity between 2008 and 2015. The mean follow-up period was 24.4 months. Of the 58 patients, 42 were diagnosed with osteoporosis and 16 were diagnosed as normal. The radiological and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up, including HV angle, intermetatarsal (IM) angle, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, patient satisfaction, visual analogue scale (VAS), and complication. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in HV angle and IM angle between the osteoporosis group and normal bone mineral densitometry group at all time points, preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the AOFAS score and VAS evaluations. In the osteoporosis group, the mean HV angle improved from 36.7° preoperatively to 11.3° at the time of final follow-up, and the mean IM angle improved from 13.2° to 5.7°. The mean AOFAS score improved from 52.6 preoperatively to 89.1 at the time of final follow-up. With respect to satisfaction, 83.4% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied. There were no serious complications, and all cases showed complete union at the osteotomy site. CONCLUSION: We believed that scarf osteotomy is a safe, effective procedure for the correction of elderly patients with osteoporosis.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Ankle , Congenital Abnormalities , Densitometry , Follow-Up Studies , Foot , Hallux Valgus , Hallux , Miners , Osteoporosis , Osteotomy , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate any differences in the osteoporosis treatments of elderly patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee joints, in accordance with the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) criteria versus the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(R), http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/) criteria, which is a fracture risk assessment tool developed by the WHO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2010 to March 2011, we investigated and screened the target populations of osteoporosis treatments among 65-year-old or older patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee joints who scheduled to undergo elective total knee arthroplasty. They were classified in the treatment group only if they met either the HIRA criterion, defined as having a T score of or =20% or > or =3%, respectively. RESULTS: Of a total of 929 patients, the number of patients included in the treatment group as screened according to the HIRA or FRAX(R) criteria was 562 (60.5%) and 372 (40.0%), respectively. The number of patients who met both criteria was 339 (36.5%), and including 334 non-treated patients (36.0%), a total of 673 patients (72.4%) showed low diagnostic concordance (k=0.471). Of 319 patients diagnosing osteopenia, 33 (10.3%) patients were included in the treatment group according to the FRAX(R) criteria. CONCLUSION: A combination of the HIRA and FRAX(R) criteria is required to improve the current guidelines for osteoporosis treatment.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Arthroplasty , Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hip , Insurance, Health , Knee , Knee Joint , Osteoarthritis , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Risk Assessment , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
Krukenberg tumor of the ovary, originally described by Krukenberg as "Fibrosarcoma ovarii mucocellulare carcinomatodes", characterized as an infiltrative mucinous carcinoma of predominant signet-ring cell type, almost metastasize from gastrointestinal tract, is not common tumor. In recent years, we have experienced 2 cases of Krukenberg tumors on both ovaries metastasis from the stomach, and report these cases with brief review of the literatures.